Evaluation of
Antimicrobial Activity of Casuarina equisetifolia Frost (Casuarinaceae)
Anil
Kumar Aher1, Subodh Pal1, Sadahev Yadav2, Umesh
Patil2 and Snehendu Bhattacharya3
1Natural Product Lab.,Department
of Pharmacognosy,
2V.N.S.
3Dr.
ABSTRACT
The crude methanolic
extracts of bark, wood, leaf and fruits of Casuarina equisetifolia and chromatographically
isolated compounds were studied for antibacterial and antifungal activity by
Cup and Plate method. Various parts of plant were collected from near by Nashik region identified as Casuarina equisetifolia
Linn Family Casuarinaceae by P. S. N. Rao, Joint Director, Botanical Survey of India, Pune (M.S.).The plant materials were dried in oven at 40 0C.
The structures of isolated compounds were confirmed by spectroscopic
techniques. The compounds ANA 01, ANA 02 and ANA 04 were confirmed as Catechin, Ellagic acid and Gallic
acid from bark; Quercetin (ANA 03) and (ANA 05) Lupeol were characterized from leaf and fruit respectively.
The screenings of antibacterial and antifungal activities of isolated compounds
were compared with Ampicillin (10units/disc) and Ketokonazole (10units/disc).
The isolated
compounds ANA01-05 have shown activity against Gram negative bacteria and less
activity against Gram positive bacteria. Among these, ANA04 (Gallic acid) and
ANA05 (Lupeol) have shown good activity against
Gram-negative (E. coli and Pseudomonas aeuroginosa) bacteria.
Methanolic
extracts of wood, bark and fruit has shown good activity (10.0, 12.0 and 10.0
mm respectively) against Gram positive microorganisms (Staph. aureous) while the extracts were
without any effect against Gram negative microorganism. Fruit extract has
resulted in good antifungal activity against Candida albicans. Lupeol
was isolated from fruit which has shown similar (8.0 mm) antifungal activity.
Key words: - Casuarina equisetifolia, Antibacterial, Antifungal, Cup and Plate
method.
INTRODUCTION
Casuarina equisetifolia (Casuarinaceae)
is handsome tree with drooping branches, 10-50 m high1. It is found
in dry hill sides of open forests in
The biological activities, viz. anticancer,
antibacterial9, hypoglycemic, antifungal2 of the leaf has
been reported. Antibacterial activity was shown by isolated compounds 24-ethyl
cholest-5, 22-dien-3β-ol, 24-ethyl cholest-5-en-3β-ol, 24-methyl
cholest-5-en-3β-ol and cholesterol from leaves against Staph. aureus11.
Literature review suggests that the
antimicrobial activity of the plant has not been comparatively studied and
hence in the present study the same was investigated for isolated compounds.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS: -
Preparation
of Plant extracts: -
Coarsely powdered materials of leaf, bark, wood and
fruit (100 g each) were subjected to reflux with 250 ml of methanol for 4 hrs
coded as MEL, MEB, MEW and MEF followed by subsequent filtration and
evaporation to yield extract. The extracts were autoclaved at 121oC
and 15 lbs pressure and stored at 4oC. The extracts were dissolved
in DMSO (5%w/v) for screening of activity.
Separation and isolation of Phytoconstituents by chromatographic methods: -
Gradient fractionation of acetone soluble part from methanolic bark extract by column chromatography was
performed by the using Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Methanol (4:3:3) followed by
Methanol resulting in the isolation of compounds designated as ANA 01(Catechin), ANA 04 (Gallic acid) and ANA 02(Ellagic acid).
The suitable solvent systems were developed for the
identification of active phytoconstituents by Thin
layer chromatography. Lupeol was identified from
Petroleum-ether extract of bark and fruits of the Casuarina equisetifolia by Benzene: Ethyl acetate
(9:1) followed by spraying with Vanillin-sulphuric
acid reagent. The Petroleum-ether extract of fruit was processed by PTLC to
isolate compound designated as ANA 05 (Lupeol). Methanolic extract of leaf was chromatographed
with Quercetin by Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid
(5:4:1), followed by spraying with Ferric chloride. The presence of quercetin was evidenced in U.V. light. The methanolic extract of leaf was processed by PTLC to isolate
compound designated as ANA 03 (Quercetin).
Characterization of Isolated
Compounds: -
The isolated compounds were characterized with help of
the instrumental techniques UV spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, Mass
spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy.
Characterization of Compound ANA01
UV (MeOH) max: 219,279 nm;
FT-IR: (KBr): 3820.10,
3391.85 (O-H), 2933.20, 2892.27, 1627.56(C=O), 1522.37, 1471.52,
1289.96(C-O-C), 1245.99, 1198.02(C-O) and 868.70 cm-1.
LC-ESI-MS: m/e: 290(5%, M+
,C15H 16O+6 ),
289(12%, M+-1),245(32%, M+-CH3O2),
205(100%, M+-C2H6O4) ,203 (40%) and
179(5%).
13C-NMR (DMSO, 300 MHz): ): d 156.59(C-7),
156.33(C-5), 155.51(C-3’), 144.99(C-4’), 130.75(C-8), 118.64(C-6), 115.26(C-6’),
114.64(C-9),99.23(C-10),95.27(C-5’),94.02(C-2’),81.12(C-3),66.45(C-2) and
27.98(C-4).
1HNMR (DMSO, 300 MHz): d 9.01(s),
6.72(1H,H-6,8,s), 6.68(1H,H-2’,5’,s), 6.61(1H,H-6’,s), 5.88(s),
5.70(1H,H-5,7,s), 4.92(1H,H-3’,4’,s), 4.48(1H,H-3,s), 3.56(1H,H-3,s),2.39(s),2.37(s)
and 2.64(2H,H-4,d).
Characterization of compound ANA02
UV (MeOH) max: 365.0, 254.0 nm;
FT-IR: (KBr): 3072.72,
3596.20(O-H),
1699.60(C=O),1622.21(C=C),1581.82,1509.10,1447.52,1398.43(C-O),1195.11 and
,882.06 cm-1.
LC-ESI-MS: m/e: 301.8(10%, M+-
C14H 6O+8) 300.7(10%),283.8(40%),
271.9(4%) ,256.8 (50%, M+-H2O+O2), 228.9(100%,
M+-CH3O4), 212.9(8%),200.9(30%) and
184.9(60%).
13C-NMR (C6D5N,
300MHz): ): d
164.23(C-7,7’),142.09(C-2,3,2’,3’), 124.48(s), 123.11(C-4,5,6,4’,5’,6’) and
111.92(C-1,1’).
1HNMR (C6D5N,
300 MHz): d 8.14(1H,H-1’,s) and
5.28(1H,H-2,3,2’,3’,s).
Characterization of compound ANA03
UV (MeOH) max: 255, 372nm;
FT-IR:
(KBr): 3405.97(O-H), 3100.53, 1667.12(C=O), 1627.56(C=C),
1522.37, 1471.52, 1319.97(C-O), 1262.97(C-O-C), 1198.94
and 868.70 cm-1.
LC-ESI-MS: m/e: 301.7 (0.5%, M+,C15H 10O+6
), 272.9 (6%),256.7 (15%), 229.2(8%) ,192.8 (10%),178.8(100%, M+-C6H6O2)
and 150.9(65%, M+-C7H6O3).
13C-NMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz): ): d 177.70 (C-4), 165.95 (C-7), 162.87 (C-5), 158.58 (C-3), 149.13 (C-3’), 148.35 (C-4’), 146.59 (C-2), 137.61 (C-1’), 124.51 (C-9),
122.04 (C-10), 116.98 (C-8), 116.36 (C-6),
104.88 (C-6’), 99.60 (C-2’) and 94.78 (C-5’).
1HNMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz): d 7.74(1H,H-6,s),
7.73(1H,H-8,s), 7.65(1H,H-2’,s), 7.62(1H,H-5’,s), 6.89(1H,H-6’,s),
6.86(1H,H-3,), 6.38(1H,H-7,s), 6.18(H-5,s) and 4.88(1H,H-3’,4’,s).
Characterization of compound ANA04
UV (MeOH) lmax: 272.8 nm;
FT-IR:
(KBr): 3285.28(O-H), 3072.72, 1703.34(C=O),
1615.63(C=C), 1501.90, 1446.96, 1339.41, 1245.99 and 867.96 cm-1.
LC-ESI-MS: m/e: 169.9 (M+, C6H
6O+5,) 168.9 (100%, M+-1) and 125 (40%, M+-COOH).
13C-NMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz):: d 170.936 (C-7), 146.755 (C-3,C-5), 140.023 (C-4), 122.792 (C-1)and 110.79 (C-2,C-6).
1HNMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz): d 9.136 (1H,H-7,s), 7.08 (1H,H-2,H-6,s) and 5.011 (1H,H-3,H-4,H-5,s).
Characterization of Compound ANA05
UV (MeOH) max: 211.4nm;
FT-IR: (KBr): 3325.02,
3083.22, 2937.88, 1642.30(C=C), 1451.71, 1378.36(O-H, bend) and 1106.83 cm-1;
LC-ESI-MS: m/e: 426.7 (0.5%, M+, C30H
50O+), 410.4 (12%, M+-H2O),366.0 (5%), 353.2 (6%) ,339.4 (20%), 325.5(2%),
311.4(4%),299.4(27%),285.3(52%),271.3(80%, M+-C9H19),257.3(100%,M+-C10H21),
243.2(80%, M+-C11H23),229.4(75%),215.3(60%),201.3(40%),189.3(25%),175.4(52%),159.3(25%) and 137.2(7%);
13C-NMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz): d 151.48 (C-20), 124.55 , 109.97 (C-25), 78.49 (C-3), 56.233(C-5),51.271(C-9),48.989(C-18),48.778(C-19),43.68(C-17),43.518(C-14),41.592(C-8),40.572(C-22),39.504(C-4),38.938(C-1),37.886(C-13),36.219(C-10),35.069
(C-16),28.531(C-21),28.272(C-23),28.175(C-15),25.957(C-12),21.604(C-11),19.451(C-30),19.046(C-6),18.270(C-2),16.586(C-24),16.392(C-28),16.068(C-25),14.903(C-27).
1HNMR (d6- acetone,
300 MHz): d 4.70(1H,H-29,d),
4.56(1H,H-27,dd), 3.32(1H,H-3,s), 3.13(1H,-3,s),
2.83(2H,H-1,2,6,7,11,12,15,16,m), 2.44(H-20,H-21,sex),
1.69(3H,H-22,23,24,25,26,28), 1.07(s), 0.99(s),0.86(multiplet) and 0.76(s).
Preparation of isolated
compounds: -
The isolated compounds ANA01-05 (0.001 % w/v solutions
in DMSO) obtained from column chromatography were used for antimicrobial
screening of activity.
Table 1: - Antimicrobial activity of Casuarina equisetifolia
|
Sr.No. |
Test compound |
Zone of inhibition ( in mm) [Mean±S.D.] |
|||
|
Microorganism |
|||||
|
E. coli NCIM 2109 |
Staph. aureus NCIM 2079 |
Pseudomonas aeuroginosa NCIM 2036 |
Candida albicans MTCC 227 |
||
|
1
|
MEL |
7.0 |
-- |
8.0 |
-- |
|
2
|
MEB |
-- |
10.0 |
-- |
-- |
|
3
|
MEW |
7.0 |
12.0 |
-- |
-- |
|
4
|
MEF |
-- |
10.0 |
-- |
8 |
|
5
|
ANA01 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
-- |
|
6
|
ANA02 |
11.0 |
-- |
7.0 |
-- |
|
7
|
ANA03 |
10.0 |
-- |
8.0 |
-- |
|
8
|
ANA04 |
11.0 |
-- |
14.0 |
-- |
|
9
|
ANA05 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
12.0 |
8 |
|
10
|
Gentamycin |
24 |
24 |
24 |
-- |
|
11
|
Kitokonazole |
-- |
-- |
-- |
23 |
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antimicrobial activity of Methanolic
extracts of Casuarina equisetifolia
with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Photo 01: -Antimicrobial
activity of Methanolic extracts of Casuarina equisetifolia
with E.coli
and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Test organisms: -
Pathogenic bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus
NCIM 2079, (Gram positive), Escherichia
coli NCIM 2109, Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCIM 2036 (Gram Negative) and fungi like Candida albicans
MTCC 227 were used for screening of antimicrobial activity. The microbial
strains were obtained from National Chemical Laboratory,
Photo 02: - Antimicrobial
activity of Methanolic extracts of Casuarina equisetifolia
with Staph. aureous and Candida albicans
Antimicrobial activity: -
Antimicrobial
activity of the crude extracts and isolated compounds were investigated against pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains by the Cup- plate method12.
Muller Hinton agar and Sabouraud Dextrose agar media
were used for antibacterial and antifungal activities respectively. Disc of Gentamycin
and Ketoconazole
(Hi-media Lab., Mumbai) were served as reference standards. In each of
well (6 mm in diameter), 0.1 ml of the tests were transferred to cups
aseptically. The plates containing bacterial strains and fungal strains were
incubated at 37 ±0.5oC and 28±0.5oC for 48 hrs
respectively. The zone of inhibition (mm) was calculated by measuring the
diameter of the zone of bacterial and fungal growth around the cup (Photo 1 and
2). The average of three independent determinations was recorded (Table 1).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
-
Spectroscopic
data showed the chemical nature of compounds which were confirmed by
comparative TLC with respective standards. Methanolic
extract of bark resulted in separation of ANA01 (Catechin),
ANA02 (Ellagic acid) and ANA04 (Gallic acid). Methanolic extract of leaf and petroleum extract of fruit
showed the presence of ANA03 (Quercetin) and ANA05 (Lupeol) respectively.
On antibacterial
activity screening, the isolated compound ANA 04 and 05 showed activity against
Gram negative bacteria, E. coli and Pseudomonas aeuroginosa.
ANA 04 identified as Gallic acid showed comparable activity with standard Gentamycin (14 mm).
Methanolic extracts
of wood, bark and fruit has shown good activity against Gram positive microorganisms
(Staph. aureus)
while the extracts were without any effect against Gram negative microorganism.
The Gram positive bacteria were more susceptible than Gram negative bacteria
which may be the result of differences in cell wall structure between Gram positive and Gram negative
bacteria where Gram negative bacteria has outer membrane acting as barrier to
many environmental substances including antibiotics13.
Fruit extract and
its isolate ANA 05 (Lupeol) have shown similar antifungal activity (8 mm)against
Candida albicans.
The results of
the present study support the folkloric usage by Cook Islanders in the form of
an infusion of the grated bark to treat mouth and urinary tract infections2 The bark extract possess Gallic acid
with antibacterial properties that can be used as antimicrobial agents in new
drugs for the therapy of infectious diseases caused by pathogens.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors are thankful to the Dr. S.B.Wagh,
Principal, NDMVPS College of Pharmacy, Nashik for
providing necessary facilities.
REFERENCES: -
1.
2. Han ST. Medicinal
Plants in South Pacific, Western Pacific Series No.19, WHO Regional
publications,
3. Ansary EL et al. Flavonol glycosides of Casuarina equisetifolia.
Biosci. 1977:32C:444 -445.
4. Madhusudanamma W et al. Isolation
and Characterization of Alicyclic acids, Polyols &Amino acids from Casuarina equisetifolia. Leather Sci. (
5. Rastogi RP and Mehrotra BN. Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, Central drug Research
Institute,
6.
Roux, DG. d-Gallocatechin
from the bark of Casuarina equisetifolia
Linn. Nature. 1957: 179:158-159.
7.
Madhulata W et al. Phenolic
constituents present in Casuarina fruits and wood.
Leather Sci. (
8.
Chopra RN, Nayar SL and Chopra IC. Glossary of Indian Medicinal
Plants, National Institute of Science Communications (C.S.I.R.),
9.
Anonymous. Wealth of
10.
11.
Rastogi RP and Mehrotra BN. Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, Vol.4,CDRI
12.
Cimanga RK et al.
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of some extracts and fractions of Mitracarpus scaber Zucc. (Rubiaceae). J. of Natural
Remedies. 2004: 4:17-25.
13.
Chandrasekaran M et al.
Antibacterial activity of faty acid metrhyl esters of Ipomoea
pes-caprae L. Indian Drugs. 2005:42(5): 275-281.
Received on 17.04.2009
Accepted on 12.05.2009
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 1(1): July.-Aug. 2009, 64-68